US Finance World

Credit Cards, Bank Rates, Insurance, Loans, Debts and Mortgages News

Archive for March, 2010

We have yet another recent transaction out of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A). And, you guessed it, they’re selling more Moody’s (MCO) shares.

Just a few days ago we noted how Buffett was selling MCO and their latest Form 4 filed with the SEC shows recent activity on March 23rd & 24th. On the 23rd they sold 148,054 shares at a weighted price of $30.2195. The next day they sold 57,574 more shares at $30.3661. After these sales, they still owned 30,786,876 shares. Please note that these shares are owned by NICO and GEICO, subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway. As we pointed out before, it’s very clear that Berkshire finds anything above $25 as a fair price to sell MCO shares at and they tend to sell shares in the high-20′s.

The rationale behind these sales is still somewhat up in the air. Before the Burlington Northern (BNI) acquisition, Buffett was selling MCO shares to help finance that transaction. However, they still continue to sell some Moody’s so they could also be looking to reduce their overall position size.

Read more…

27
Mar

Three Reasons Why XLF Is Soaring

Financial shares were among the hardest hit during the “Great Recession” that began in late 2008 when many institutions crumbled under the weight of massive debts. The crisis caused many casualties and lead to significant restructuring in the industry, as former foes became partners in a variety of financial niches. Although many financial companies lagged behind the broad market for quite some time, the survivors have made an impressive push in recent months. Bank of America (BAC) is up nearly 600% since its lows a year ago, while J.P. Morgan (JPM) has more than doubled and Wells Fargo (WFC) has tripled in the same period. This amazing run-up has delivered some big gains to investors who managed to spot the true market bottom. After surging in 2009, financial ETFs have continued to rally in 2010, leading some investors to believe that the worst is finally over for the industry and that the sub-prime clouds may have passed for the time being.

Read more…

As the health reforms signed into law this week begin to take effect over the next four years, one consequence to watch is to what extent would-be entrepreneurs feel comfortable leaving their jobs to start businesses. If people can get affordable insurance outside of their jobs, some number of workers who mainly stay in their jobs for health benefits will leave to start small companies or work for themselves, the reasoning goes.

The job lock factor is particularly salient for those with pre-existing conditions or families where one spouse’s employer insurance covers the whole family — right now buying insurance on the open market can be prohibitively expensive or impossible for people in these situations. The new law won’t unleash a flood of entrepreneurs immediately because many changes won’t take effect for several years, but it is likely to shift how and when people decide to start new businesses in the years ahead.

The evidence for “job lock” is strong. One example: Americans’ likelihood of self-employment jumps when they turn 65 and become eligible for Medicare, according to research by Robert Fairlie of UC Santa Cruz, Kanika Kapur of University College Dublin, and Susan Gates of the RAND Corporation. “Business ownership rates increase from 24.6 percent for those just under age 65 to 28.0 percent for those just over age 65,” they write, and no similar uptick occurs at other ages between 55-75 that the researchers examined. That paper also found that job-lock was less of a barrier to entrepreneurship if a person’s spouse had employer coverage. “People who have spouses with health insurance are more likely to start businesses,” Fairlie told me.

We have to ask also whether reducing job lock will result in new firms that create jobs, or if most of the effect will be people working for themselves. The Atlantic’s Megan McArdle asks good questions on this point, and concludes:

On net, I’d suspect that this will be positive for entrepreneurship—but I don’t know that this will translate into a lot more growth. Enabling people to become self-employed is a fine thing, but it is not the same as enabling them to start transformative new businesses.

Economist Scott Shane, writing in BusinessWeek in January, similarly says that less job lock will create new firms and jobs. But that growth may be balanced by job losses resulting from reform as well, as the bill requires firms with 50 employees to provide health insurance or pay penalties. (It’s important to note that some of the job loss estimates are based on different versions of reform than the one passed into law.)

Backers of health reform certainly hope it will help reduce job lock. In her speech to the House of Representatives before voting on the law, Speaker Nancy Pelosi said:

I believe that this legislation will unleash tremendous entrepreneurial power into our economy. … Imagine an economy where people could follow their passions and their talent without having to worry that their children would not have health insurance, that if they had a child with diabetes who was bipolar or pre-existing medical condition in their family, that they would be job-locked. Under this bill, their entrepreneurial spirit will be unleashed.

There’s a flip side to this for employers to consider: Some of their most talented, ambitious, and entrepreneurial employees have one less reason to stick around once they can get health insurance elsewhere.

“That is something that was really holding a lot of people who were already feeling not a lot of loyalty to companies,” says Pamela Slim, a business coach and author of Escape from Cubicle Nation. “That is one of the most common comments I hear from people: ‘I’d love to quit my job … but it really is hard to give up the benefits.’”

By the time health reform fully takes effect in 2014, we’re likely to have a better economy and stronger job market. At that point, if people who have long nurtured entrepreneurial ambitions can get affordable health insurance outside of their employers, there will be little to stop them from quitting.

27
Mar

Bank Lending, Big Government Style

The latest weekly read of “Total loans and Leases of all Commercial Banks” indicates that banks are pulling back lending at the fastest pace on record with total loans and leases declining 8.55% on an annual basis.

U.S. government securities at all commercial banks, on the other hand, are booming, increasing 13.45% on a year-over-year basis.

This likely underscores a fundamental quirk of today’s commercial lending environment.

High rates of delinquency and default on business and consumer loans are working to tighten direct commercial lending overall while government sponsored lending activities, such as is carried out through Fannie, Freddie, Ginnie, Sallie and FHA, work to prop specific lines of lending.

Commercial banks are, in a sense, refusing to generally lend unless they have a government guarantee.

Further, with the latest aggressive round of government mortgage mitigation initiatives the risks associated to lending directly to households is likely becoming more uncertain. (

Read more…

I have been working with a young couple for a year now. They have been up against it. They look pretty typical. They bought an apartment with a first mortgage and low down payment. Then they made improvements with a HELOC. He lost his good job and now works for less. She works long hours and they have a kid.

They are underwater on the 1st mortgage so the HELOC is worthless. Their monthly cash flow including debt service has been negative for a long time. They have been paying the mortgage(s) by drawing down more on the HELOC.

I advised them a year ago to stop the madness. They tried to contact their lenders for assistance but were told they did not qualify for a re-financing, as they were current on their mortgage.

I told them to stop paying. But they would have none of that. They had built up a credit rating that they were both very proud of. They did not want to lose that. But more importantly they felt that walking on IOUs was something that morally they could not do. Read more…

27
Mar

Ares Buys Allied Capital: What’s Next?

Allied Capital (ALD) shareholders today approved the acquisition of the company by Ares Capital (ARCC). Allied Capital is the oldest Business Development Company (“BDC”) and the second company in this sector to be swallowed up by a more successful BDC, after Patriot Capital (bought by Prospect Capital (PSEC)-another BDC-late last year). The merger will take effect on April Fool’s Day.

With all the folderol of the Prospect Capital counter-offer for Allied and the public name calling which followed behind us, what have we learned about the BDC industry that might be of use going forward?

The principal lesson is that the most obvious buyers for BDC companies up for sale seem to be other BDCs, which is relatively small universe. Patriot Capital claims to have had numerous potential suitors, but Prospect Capital ended up winning the deal. Allied Capital appears to have only had meaningful discussions with Prospect and Ares. Where

Read more…

26
Mar

Ambac Unit Now Essentially Junk

Yesterday, the rating agency Standard & Poor’s slashed the rating of Ambac Assurance (“AAC”), a unit of Ambac Financial Group (ABK), to “R” from “CC.” This move was fueled by the announcement of the Officer of Commissioner of Insurance (OCI) regarding the rehabilitation of AAC liabilities.

The OCI yesterday ordered AAC to create a segregated fund, which would contain $35 billion of the company’s liabilities on policies related to residential mortgage-backed securities and $29 billion on other credit derivatives and structured finance products. No claims will be made with respect to any policies under the segregated account until the rehabilitation plan is approved by the court, which might take six months. A moratorium on claims payment has been put to conserve Ambac’s reserves.

The regulatory intervention is meant to protect investors of municipal bond issues. Ambac Assurance has been under constant vigilance by the regulators with regard to capital and surplus targets. It has been hit

Read more…

26
Mar

Must-Have Tips for Buying a Pre-owned or Used Car

The Internet has made it very simple for consumers to find out what a pre-owned or used car is worth, which cars last the longest, and which have the best resale value. Before you venture out to dealerships or used car lots, do some research.

Edmunds, offers both consumer and expert reviews for used vehicles including value and lifetime performance histories. Once you’ve compared used vehicles, find out what you might pay by visiting NADA’s website. NADA allows you to enter a vehicle by year, make, model, and mileage along with preferred equipment to give you a wholesale and retail value. Make sure you print out your research, you will need it when it’s time to negotiate the deal.

Keep in mind when shopping, that the NADA wholesale value is what a dealer or used car lot paid for the car. The retail value is what you should expect to pay, although most retail prices can be negotiated.

It’s also a good idea to learn important facts about used or pre-owned cars. By ta

Read more…