17
May
Posted by Christine Davis
There are numerous themes we’re seeing with regards to arbitration claims and lawsuits filed and submitted against the broker-dealer houses. One major theme is the possible misrepresentation, or material omission, of risks associated with investments in complex CDO products that subsequently went bad, or awful.
Certain CDOs are good: the run-of-the-mill CLOs, for example, turned out just fine (aside from some slight hiccups with certain Lehman LCDS CDOs that were hit by the torturous ipso facto clause decision in U.S. bankruptcy court). Several market participants, however, are trying to estimate comparative litigation risk by estimating the percentage market share of all CDOs, assuming that all CDOs are toxic. This is a mistake: it usually portrays banks like JP Morgan (JPM) as a comparatively high litigation risk (>10% market share) by this metric, whereas JPM was indeed rather a small player (<4% market share) in structuring the CDOs that subsequently underperformed. T
Read more…
17
May
Posted by Christine Davis
On April 28th I published a piece on the FHLBs. Later I was contacted by the FHFA (the regulator for the FHLBs). They pointed to a factual error in my post and asked me to publish a correction.
I said the following:
Fannie (FNM) and Freddie (FRE) will cost us at least $400 billion. Add in another $100b for the FHLBs.
It is not correct that the FHLBs will suffer total losses of $100b. The FHFA provided a link to a balance sheet of the FHLB’s. The following is a slide of that report. As you can see (click to enlarge) there is a line item marked investments of $284B.
I relied on a the following sentence from an FHFA report to evaluate the investment portfolio:
FHLBanks’ investment portfolios consist primarily of MBS securities, chiefly Agency MBS or highly rated private-label MBS.
When I think of the term, “private label MBS” I immediately think losses. And i
Read more…
17
May
Posted by Christine Davis
One of my favorite cartoons for the paranoid is a fitting companion for the graph that follows:

From the 5-Min. Forecast comes a recasting of a familiar graphic to those following the housing market:

This does indeed look like the eye of the storm for mortgage problems, but it may not be as bad as it might look. Here are two reasons:
- The biggest part of the second wave is comprised of Option ARM mortgages, which are not necessarily of low quality.
- Interest rates remain historically low and resets may occur with little increase in payment. I have received reports from individuals who have reset to lower rates during the past year.
However, there are reasons that Option ARMs could become a problem.
Read more…